A review of Crisis in the Red Zone by Richard Preston,
Random House, 2019
Richard Preston the foremost author
writing about hemorrhagic fever, especially Ebola, provides a blow-by-blow,
day-by-day, chronicle of how the 2013/14 Ebola epidemic arose, grew, and
swamped West Africa in disease and death.
He tells of patient zero, a child in Guinea, and tabulates how the virus
spread via contaminated bodily fluids, specifically through traditional funeral
practices and/or care for those infected.
At first no one in the medical establishment knew what they were dealing
with, perhaps malaria, perhaps Lassa fever.
No one knew of Ebola in West Africa. When laboratories in the U.S. and
Europe finally identified the virus as Ebola, the epidemic had already killed
hundreds. Thousands more were to die.
The bulk of the book details the personal
stories of the heroic work of front-line medical personnel in Kenema, Sierra
Leone and their efforts to find victims, identify the virus, but mostly to care
for the infected. Preston writes of
bloody medical procedures, the difficulty of working in protective gear, and
the challenges of providing care in overcrowded unsanitary wards, as well as
the need to counter community fears and suspicions engendered by so many
deaths. An additional challenge was the
necessity to get the outside world to recognize the scope of the tragedy and to
step up.
In order to put the 2014 outbreak
in perspective, Preston remembers the first major outbreak in the Congo in
1976. Again, the author effectively employs personal vignettes in order to tell
the tale. In the Congo hundreds died
before village communities there invoked the ancient rule, a practice of
isolation and quarantine in which those infected were left to live or die.
Either way the disease ran its course and did not spread further.
In addition to events in West
Africa, Preston also details how individuals in the U.S. and Europe, the small
community of folks who tracked dangerous viruses, worked to identify the virus,
parse its DNA and begin to create an antidote. Once one dose (of 7) was in West Africa,
medical personnel there were confronted with the ethical issue of who should
receive it. ZMAPP vaccine was not used
in Sierra Leone to save a key doctor but was used in Liberia to save an
American doctor and a nurse.
By the time more vaccine could be
produced, the terrible epidemic had largely run its course. Two key doctors and thirty-seven nurses from Kenema
Hospital numbered among the 10,000 dead in the region.
Preston concludes with a warning:
with Ebola we were lucky! The world is not prepared for a lethal virus that
could devastate the planet’s huge cities.
Comment: The book focuses narrowly on the early spread
of the disease coupled with efforts in the U.S. to identify the scourge. What is missing is an assessment of how
governments of the three affected countries (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone)
acted, how the international community intervened, with what assistance and
when. I was the interim U.S. ambassador
in Freetown in August and September of 2014 at the height of the epidemic. CDC
had dozens of experts on the ground, to be followed by disaster team from
USAID. Neighboring Liberia had more of the same including a belated U.S.
military presence. It did take some
time, but finally the collective effort of many governments and organizations
helped stem the tide. As Preston
correctly notes Ebola died out – this time – essentially because the ancient
rule of isolation, quarantine, and no contact was implemented by the
governments and communities affected.
A separate note: As U.S. Ambassador
in the Central African Republic (1992-1995) I once visited the town of Mobaye,
located on the Oubangui River across from Zaire. The Ebola River and the mission of Yambuku
where Ebola first surfaced in 1976 were nearby. Zairians often came to Mobaye for
market and health care. While touring the local hospital I asked the doctor in
charge about procedures for patients who had hemorrhagic fever. He said such
people did not come to the hospital, instead they quarantined themselves or the
village did, or neighboring villages did, while the disease ran its course.
Clearly this was the ancient rule that Preston identified being
implemented.
No comments:
Post a Comment