A review of Rwanda - From
Genocide to Precarious Peace, by Susan Thomson. Yale University Press, New
haven, 2018.
This book updates the situation in Rwanda today - some 24
years after the genocide. Author Thomson
details the changes and continuities since that terrible time. She describes
how the current rulers of Rwanda have crafted a society of rules and regulations
enforced by societal norms, peer pressures engineered by the regime and
outright authoritarian control. She sees
much precedent for the strict codes and enforcement thereof arising in Rwanda’s
pre-colonial history and carried forward to modern times. Rwandans are used to being ordered about and
coerced into conformity by whomever the ruling elites are. Thomson delves into the self centered state
and society now in place where although ethnic identity is squashed, Hutu
citizens remain implicated and collectively guilty of genocide against Tutsi. The charge of genocide denial or
participation is an effective deterrent to political activism. Consequently,
the state is firmly controlled by a small ruling Tutsi elite, who intend for
the nation to evolve into a progressive entity dispensing economic and social
progress for all. For now however, it is
only the ruling elites and a growing middle class that reap such benefits. The poverty stricken masses see few paths out
of their circumstances. But that is where Rwanda is - trying to move ahead, but
enacting counterproductive policies - with greater social and political
openness stymied by the impact of genocide.
Thomson’s critique is pretty harsh and probably justified in
looking at Rwanda through western eyes. Her judgment of “precarious peace” is an
accurate depiction of Rwanda today.
Western criticisms aside, Rwandans are inextricably bound together in
their society and polity and they are going to have to work this out by
themselves. Class rather than ethnicity will probably shape political divisions
in years to come and the authoritarian state is unlikely to disappear. Whether or not this might lead to violence is
speculative, but another genocide as properly defined is unlikely.
Readers interested in Rwanda and/or the recovery of
societies traumatized by violence will find this an interesting read.